Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights whilst respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing during the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

Online access to civil and criminal cases in pick circuit courts. Cases may very well be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.

V)      During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal on the deceased was caused by the petitioner but in support of opinion in the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is available within the file and mere ipsi dixit of police just isn't binding about the Court.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion can be regarded, however, we are crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject to availability of vacancy matter for the approval from the competent authority.

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID demanded) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts with the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a properly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be one or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason for your decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge on the Judgment within time. Read more

Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if get more info a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.

Knowledge of the accused is a matter to become inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard to get proved otherwise.”

The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report on the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the reduced courts.

90 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for getting to be entitled being deemed for promotion into a higher grade, of course, isn't without logic because the officer who is initially inducted to some particular post needs to serve within the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a very befitting fashion.

It's also important to note that granting of seniority to your civil servant without the actual duration of service virtually violates all the service structure like a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention on the legislation nor of your equity. Read more